 |
|
During the next decade and into this one, the situation has changed in two ways. First, the number of research papers on sea turtles (106) has increased relative to the number on freshwater turtles (135). Second, many of the authors of freshwater turtle papers were formerly authors of sea turtle papers. This is a healthy sign, for all of the species under study are turtles and are more similar to each other than they are to any other group of organisms.
The same basic biological principles apply. All turtles lay eggs and begin life as vulnerable prey items for a vast array of predators. Most develop self-protection through large size and body armor. Perhaps the greatest similarity between marine and freshwater turtles is the documented longevity of individuals, which exceeds that of almost all other animals. Therefore, they should be studied as a group for many aspects of their biology, although different questions may be asked relative to certain physiological questions influenced by salinity levels. Or, certain ecological questions may need to be approached differently, such as ones involving the immense ocean distances traveled by some of the sea turtles compared to overland travel by freshwater species. Also, most turtles face innumerable human-caused perils, some that are similar and some that differ depending on whether the turtle lives in the ocean, in fresh water, or on land.
My objective is threefold: (1) to discuss the connectedness between research ecology conducted on sea turtles; (2) provide accounts of significant research conducted on freshwater turtles that was carried out by former sea turtle researchers; (3) recognize the conservation and protection problems faced by all turtles that will be aided greatly by the combined efforts of all turtle conservation ecologists.
Some might argue about whether advances in ecological knowledge of freshwater turtles preceded that for sea turtles by a few years, or about whether sea turtle researchers have benefited scientifically from the advances made by freshwater turtle ecologists. But few are likely to disagree that successful conservation and protection for sea turtles has greatly exceeded that for freshwater turtles in virtually all categories, and has preceded it by decades. Sea turtle conservationists have done a fine job of garnering public support for protecting marine species. An increasing number of freshwater species would profit greatly if such successful efforts could be directed toward their plight as well.
Crossing the Bridge: Setting the Example
Five individuals associated with the University of Georgia’s Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) are investigators who have published a significant study on freshwater turtles as well as having conducted research with sea turtles prior to moving inland. Figuratively, they have crossed the bridge between salt water and fresh. Some have subsequently moved back to the ocean and can’t seem to make up their minds.
Nat Frazer emerged early from the sea, having conducted his doctoral work on nesting patterns of loggerhead sea turtles on Little Cumberland Island, Ga., and is noted for his published model on estimated survivorship patterns of the species. In later years he developed two of the most complete actuarial life tables ever constructed on the demography of any turtle, based on the foundation of research data on two freshwater species (eastern mud turtle and yellow-bellied slider) already available at SREL, while continuing to publish material based on his interest in sea turtles.
Stephen Morreale made his debut as a turtle biologist through his research with Jim Spotila, Ed Standora, and G. J. Ruiz, which resulted in their 1982 publication in Science on the importance of temperature dependent sex determination to conservation of the green sea turtle. Both Spotila and Standora had conducted freshwater turtle research at SREL, thus developing the bridge between freshwater and the sea from the landward side. When Steve came to SREL, he used several years of data already collected during field studies by others, augmented with data of his own, and published a paper on terrestrial movement patterns of freshwater turtles. The paper established the maxim that adult male freshwater turtles characteristically move overland more frequently and for greater distances than do females.
Rebecca Yeomans came to SREL as a graduate student after assisting Anne and Peter Meylan with their studies of sea turtles in Panama. For someone whose only previous research experience had been with sea turtles, Rebecca did an outstanding field experiment with freshwater turtles at SREL. The essence of her Master’s thesis was published in Animal Behavior in 1995, a study that convincingly demonstrated that under certain conditions adult slider turtles can orient unerringly for long distances overland to locate wetlands that contain standing water. The study was an extension of earlier research indicating that some turtles had the capability of leaving a drying wetland and finding their way to the nearest available water, at distances of more than a half mile.
Vinny Burke received his initial research training studying ridley sea turtles with Steve Morreale and Ed Standora in New York. Although Vinny published several important scientific papers on the diet of ridleys in the Atlantic waters off Long Island as a result of this earlier work, his most significant contribution to turtle ecology was part of his doctoral dissertation on freshwater turtles at SREL. His landmark publication in the journal Conservation Biology in 1995 on the terrestrial hibernation and nesting sites of four species of turtles provides the documentation needed to demonstrate the inadequacy of federal wetlands delineation regulations now in place. The evidence Vinny has provided underscores the need for stringent rules governing the establishment of terrestrial buffer zones around freshwater wetlands.
Tony Tucker conducted research on leatherbacks on St. Croix while a student at the University of Georgia and SREL. His publication on reproductive variation of the marine leviathan contributed greatly to our understanding of sea turtle conservation issues. However, while at SREL he turned his attention to another species, one neglected in much of the scientific literature for many years, the diamondback terrapin of the salt marshes. Tony’s publications on the diet and other aspects of the biology of terrapins on the South Carolina coast completes the turtle bridge in a geomorphological and physical sense as well as a professional one.
Such examples of turtle researchers who gained their initial experience with sea turtles and then applied their knowledge to research efforts with freshwater species were practically non-existent even two decades ago. Sea turtles were one group of animals with their own suite of investigators; freshwater turtles were another. The two seldom overlapped in regard to biological findings or even conservation measures.
Today the connection between the two is needed more than ever. Not only do we need the cross-communication from a research perspective, but the two former groups, which are rapidly melding into one among turtle researchers, need to function as one in conservation efforts. Turtle biologists, whether they conduct their research in salt water or fresh, need to join forces in efforts aimed at ameliorating the worldwide threats to this beleaguered group of animals we know as turtles.
Sea Turtle Conservancy
